Is treason OK for some?

Posted

My subject is treason, a dreadful word often reflecting bad consequences for our country. Way back in the dictionary it shows as a violation of allegiance to one’s state, i.e., our laws for sworn government people. The implication is by either deliberate contemptuous disregard or by negligence is treasonous activity.

In today’s political arena the most outstanding example is Secretary of State Clinton who admits many mistakes and goes free – but consider how many military and civil service members have been devastated by lessor discretions? I was investigated during the Cold War for mentioning Berlin Tempelhof Nadar in our unclassified telegraph back from Germany to a depot that supplies it. No harm but carelessness is unforgiveable when lives are at stake.

Now deliberate treasonous acts are different; how about that naval officer posturing before TV cameras in California streets disrespectfully disposing of military medals and inciting active duty members to mutiny during Vietnam War years? Then a member of the U.S. Senate, party candidate for U.S. President and Secretary of State for our government. Is treason OK for some?

After lengthy military service, 1942 at age 16 through 1980, I still believe in firing squads for such people.

David Cole

Harwood

Comments